1. Adrian, R., C. M. O'Reilly, H. Zagarese, S. B. Baines, D. O. Hessen, W. Keller, D. M. Livingstone, R. Sommaruga, D. Straile, E. Van Donk, G. A. Weyhenmeyer, and M. Winder, Lakes as sentinels of climate change. Limnology and Oceanography, 2009. 54(6 Part 2): p. 2283-2297. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2009.54.6_part_2.2283
2. Banita, A., R. L. C. Pârvulescu, and M. Moldovan, Integrating Remote Sensing Methods for Monitoring Lake Water Quality: A Comprehensive Review. Remote Sensing, 2024. 16(7): p. 1192. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16071192
3. Fouchal, A., Y. Tikhamarine, M. A. Benbouras, D. Souag-Gamane, and S. Heddam, Biological oxygen demand prediction using artificial neural network and random forest models enhanced by the neural architecture search algorithm. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2025. 11(1): p. 9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-024-02178-x
4. Jain, S. K., A. Kumar, S. Kumar, A. Kumar, and A. Choudhary, Data-Driven Prediction of Effluent BOD5 from an Institutional Wastewater Treatment Plant. In Advances in Data-driven Computing and Intelligent Systems: Selected Papers from ADCIS 2022, Volume 2. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2023: p. 217-224. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0981-0_17
5. Toming, K., H. Liu, T. Soomets, E. Uuemaa, T. Nõges, and T. Kutser, Estimation of the biogeochemical and physical properties of lakes based on remote sensing and artificial intelligence applications. Remote Sensing, 2024. 16(3): p. 464. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16030464
6. Mekaoussi, H., S. Heddam, N. Bouslimanni, S. Kim, and M. Zounemat-Kermani, Predicting biochemical oxygen demand in wastewater treatment plant using advance extreme learning machine optimized by Bat algorithm. Heliyon, 2023. 9(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21351
7. Oliveira-Esquerre, K. P., D. E. Seborg, R. E. Bruns, and M. Mori, Application of steady-state and dynamic modeling for the prediction of the BOD of an aerated lagoon at a pulp and paper mill: Part I. Linear approaches. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2004. 104(1-3): p. 73-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2004.05.009
8. Ning, S. K., N. B. Chang, L. Yang, H. W. Chen, and H. Y. Hsu, Assessing pollution prevention program by QUAL2E simulation analysis for the Kao-Ping River Basin, Taiwan. Journal of Environmental Management, 2001. 61(1): p. 61-76. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2000.0397
9. Chavez, P., and F. J. Chang, Simulation of multiple water quality parameters using artificial neural networks. In 7th International Conference on Hydroinformatics, Nice, France, 2006. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2580.0408
10. Virro, H., A. Kmoch, M. Vainu, and E. Uuemaa, Random forest-based modeling of stream nutrients at national level in a data-scarce region. Science of the Total Environment, 2022. 840: p. 156613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156613
11. Deng, F., W. Liu, M. Sun, Y. Xu, B. Wang, W. Liu, Y. Yuan, and L. Cui, Fine estimation of water quality in the Yangtze River Basin based on a geographically weighted random forest regression model. Remote Sensing, 2025. 17(4): p. 731. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17040731
12. Bai, Y., M. Peng, and M. Wang, A river water quality prediction method based on dual signal decomposition and deep learning. Water, 2024. 16(21): p. 3099. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16213099
13. Peng, C., Z. Xie, and X. Jin, Using ensemble learning for remote sensing inversion of water quality parameters in Poyang Lake. Sustainability, 2024. 16(8): p. 3355. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083355
14. Guo, H., X. Zhu, J. J. Huang, Z. Zhang, S. Tian, and Y. Chen, An enhanced deep learning approach to assessing inland lake water quality and its response to climate and anthropogenic factors. Journal of Hydrology, 2023. 620: p. 129466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129466
15. Leung, J. H., Y. M. Tsao, R. Karmakar, A. Mukundan, S. C. Lu, S. Y. Huang, and H. C. Wang, Water pollution classification and detection by hyperspectral imaging. Optics Express, 2024. 32(14): p. 23956-23965. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.523456
16. Saeed, A., A. Alsini, and D. Amin, Water quality multivariate forecasting using deep learning in a West Australian estuary. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2024. 171: p. 105884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105884
17. Najafzadeh, M., and A. Ghaemi, Prediction of the five-day biochemical oxygen demand and chemical oxygen demand in natural streams using machine learning methods. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2019. 191(6): p. 380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7446-8
18. Harrison, J. W., M. A. Lucius, J. L. Farrell, L. W. Eichler, and R. A. Relyea, Prediction of stream nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations from high-frequency sensors using Random Forests Regression. Science of the Total Environment, 2021. 763: p. 143005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143005
19. Ooi, K. S., Z. Chen, P. E. Poh, and J. Cui, BOD5 prediction using machine learning methods. Water Supply, 2022. 22(1): p. 1168-1183. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2021.202
20. Ziyad Sami, B. Fadi, S. D. Latif, A. N. Ahmed, M. F. Chow, M. A. Murti, A. Suhendi, B. H. Ziyad Sami, J. K. Wong, A. H. Birima, and A. El-Shafie, Machine learning algorithm as a sustainable tool for dissolved oxygen prediction: a case study of Feitsui Reservoir, Taiwan. Scientific Reports, 2022. 12(1): p. 3649. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06969-z
21. Hietala, R., H. Virkkunen, J. Salminen, P. Ekholm, J. Riihimäki, P. Laine, and T. Kirkkala, Assessment of agricultural water protection strategies at a catchment scale: case of Finland. Regional Environmental Change, 2024. 24(1): p. 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-023-02164-8
22. Ekholm, P., and S. Mitikka, Agricultural lakes in Finland: current water quality and trends. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2006. 116(1): p. 111-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-7231-3
23. ElGharbawi, T., M. R. Kaloop, J. W. Hu, et al., Hyperspectral reflectance-driven estimation of water quality parameters using hybrid random forest and support vector regression techniques. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2025. 84: p. 376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-025-12387-x
24. Kim, H. I., D. Kim, M. M. Salamattalab, M. Mahdian, S. M. Bateni, and R. Noori, Machine learning-based modeling of surface water temperature dynamics in arctic lakes. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024. 31(49): p. 59642-59655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-35173-x
25. Uddin, M. G., A. Bamal, M. T. M. Diganta, A. M. Sajib, A. Rahman, M. Abioui, and A. I. Olbert, The role of optimizers in developing data-driven model for predicting lake water quality incorporating advanced water quality model. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 2025. 122: p. 411-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2025.03.022
26. Chen, Y., H. Zhang, Y. You, J. Zhang, and L. Tang, A hybrid deep learning model based on signal decomposition and dynamic feature selection for forecasting the influent parameters of wastewater treatment plants. Environmental Research, 2025. 266: p. 120615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2024.120615
27. Hamada, M. S., H. A. Zaqoot, and W. A. Sethar, Using a supervised machine learning approach to predict water quality at the Gaza wastewater treatment plant. Environmental Science: Advances, 2024. 3: p. 132-144. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3VA00170A
28. Vainikka, A., E. Jakubavičiūtė, and P. Hyvärinen, Synchronous decline of three morphologically distinct whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus) stocks in Lake Oulujärvi with concurrent changes in the fish community. Fisheries Research, 2017. 196: p. 34-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2017.07.024
29. Ching, P. M. L., X. Zou, D. Wu, R. H. Y. So, and G. H. Chen, Development of a wide-range soft sensor for predicting wastewater BOD5 using an eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) machine. Environmental Research, 2022. 210: p. 112953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.112953
30. Dodds, W. K., and M. R. Whiles, Freshwater Ecology: Concepts and Environmental Applications of Limnology. 2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2010.
31. Wetzel, R. G., Limnology: Lake and River Ecosystems. 3rd ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2001.
32. Prowse, T., K. Alfredsen, S. Beltaos, B. R. Bonsal, W. B. Bowden, C. R. Duguay, A. Korhola, et al., Effects of changes in arctic lake and river ice. Ambio, 2011. 40(Suppl 1): p. 63-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-011-0217-6
33. Rühland, K. M., A. M. Paterson, and J. P. Smol, Lake diatom responses to warming: reviewing the evidence. Journal of Paleolimnology, 2015. 54(1): p. 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10933-015-9837-3
34. Gorham, E., and F. M. Boyce, Influence of lake surface area and depth upon thermal stratification and the depth of the summer thermocline. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 1989. 15(2): p. 233-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0380-1330(89)71479-9
35. Kalff, J., Limnology: Inland Water Ecosystems. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2002, 592 p.
36. Majidzadeh, H., H. Uzun, A. Ruecker, D. Miller, J. Vernon, H. Zhang, S. Bao, M. T. K. Tsui, T. Karanfil, and A. T. Chow, Extreme flooding mobilized dissolved organic matter from coastal forested wetlands. Biogeochemistry, 2017. 136(3): p. 293-309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-017-0394-x
37. Mitchell, T. M., Does machine learning really work? AI Magazine, 1997. 18(3): p. 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v18i3.1303
38. Jordan, M. I., and T. M. Mitchell, Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science, 2015. 349(6245): p. 255-260. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa8415
39. Zhou, Z. H., Machine Learning. Singapore: Springer Nature, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1967-3
40. Kiranyaz, S., O. Avci, O. Abdeljaber, T. Ince, M. Gabbouj, and D. J. Inman, 1D convolutional neural networks and applications: A survey. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2021. 151: p. 107398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107398
41. Breiman, L., Random forests. Machine Learning, 2001. 45(1): p. 5-32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324
42. Chen, T., and C. Guestrin, XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2016: p. 785-794. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785
43. Kumar, K. V., P. Kumari, A. Chatterjee, and D. P. Mohapatra, Software fault prediction using random forests. In: Intelligent and Cloud Computing: Proceedings of ICICC 2019, Volume 1, 2020: p. 95-103. Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5971-6_10
44. Han, S., and H. Kim, Optimal feature set size in random forest regression. Applied Sciences, 2021. 11(8): p. 3428. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11083428
45. Najah, A., A. El-Shafie, and O. Karim, Prediction of Water Quality Parameters Using Artificial Intelligence: Case Study-Johor River Basin. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 2011. https://doi.org/10.5555/2208226
46. Clilverd, H., D. White, and M. Lilly, Chemical and Physical Controls on the Oxygen Regime of Ice‐Covered Arctic Lakes and Reservoirs. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2009. 45(2): p. 500-511. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2009.00305.x
