A hybrid MCDM model for evaluation of e-learning platforms of the Municipal organization

Author

Graduate University of Advanced Technology

Abstract
Given the vast scope of responsibilities and activities in any organization, success in quantitative and qualitative aspects of human resources can only be achieved through continuous quantitative and qualitative training. For the effective execution of the missions and services of any organization, especially municipal organizations, human resource training must be implemented, particularly in the current competitive era. Training is one of the areas that has undergone a fundamental transformation in information technology. Considering the COVID-19 pandemic and quarantine, the primary role of information technology in various aspects of education, including virtual learning and optimizing various educational processes, should be taken into account. Therefore, organizations are using information technology to implement effective training processes to achieve their organizational goals. However, various criteria influence the feasibility of implementing educational methods, which may conflict with each other when selecting the most suitable e-learning platform for professional training. An efficient group multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method has been developed to select the most effective e-learning platform. Nonetheless, uncertainty in decision-makers' judgments is one of the challenges raised in group-based multi-criteria decision-making methods. Therefore, in this paper, a hybrid method based on the group Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Grey Theory has been developed to account for uncertainty in decision-makers' judgments, aiming to select the most suitable platform for utilizing information technology in the e-learning of municipal organizations. The results showed that the synchronous virtual learning platform is selected as the best platform for professional training in municipal organizations.

Keywords


1-Chen, C.-M. and S.-T. Lin, Assessing effects of information architecture of digital libraries on supporting E-learning: A case study on the Digital Library of Nature & Culture. Computers & Education, 2014. 75: p. 92-102.
2-Wang, T.-H., Developing an assessment-centered e-Learning system for improving student learning effectiveness. Computers & Education, 2014. 73: p. 189-203.
3-Lara, J., et al., A system for knowledge discovery in e-learning environments within the European Higher Education Area – Application to student data from Open University of Madrid, UDIMA. Computers & Education, 2014. 72: p. 23–36.
4-McDonald, E.W., J.L. Boulton, and J.L. Davis, E-learning and nursing assessment skills and knowledge – An integrative review. Nurse Education Today, 2018. 66: p. 166-174.
5-Coll, C., M. Rochera, and I. Gispert, Supporting online collaborative learning in small groups: Teacher feedback on learning content, academic task and social participation. Computers & Education, 2014. 75: p. 53-64.
6-Ekwunife-Orakwue, K.C.V. and T.-L. Teng, The impact of transactional distance dialogic interactions on student learning outcomes in online and blended environments. Computers & Education, 2014. 78: p. 414-427.
7-Esteban-Millat, I. and F.J. Martinez-Lopez, Modelling students' flow experiences in an online learning environment. Computers  & Education, 2014. 71: p. 111-123.
8-Alavi, S.S. and M.R. Sarmadi, Employees' opinion in Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS) on usability of in-service electronic training courses. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 2011. 10(4).
9-The eContent programme: Stimulating the production of digital content and promoting linguistic diversity.
10-Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center.
11-Ghasemi, M., et al., Evaluation of the Electronic Learning System of Medical Education (Case Study of Shahid Beheshti Medical School). Bimonthly of Education Strategies in Medical Sciences, 2018. 11(4): p. 39-52.
12-زاهد بابلان، ع.، و دیگران.، ارزشیابی کیفیت آموزش الکترونیکی نظام آموزش عالی با استفاده از مدل ارزشیابی هلم در دوران پاندومی کرونا. پژوهش در آموزش علوم پزشکی، 1402. 15(1): ص.13-21.
13-رضازاده، ا.، و دیگران.، ارزیابی و اولویت بندی عوامل مؤثر بر کیفیت آموزش در محیط های یادگیری الکترونیکی با استفاده از تکنیک فرآیند تحلیل سلسله مراتبی. آموزش و ارزشیابی (علوم تربیتی)، 1397. 41(11): ص.115-134.
14-رحمانی، ف.، و دیگران.، مکانسنجی و رتبه بندی عوامل مؤثر بر توسعه یادگیری الکترونیکی در آموزش عالی با رویکرد تصمیم گیری چند معیاره فازی. فناوری آموزش، 1398. 13(3): ص.425-440.
15-Atıcı, U., et al., A comprehensive decision framework with interval valued type-2 fuzzy AHP for evaluating all critical success factors of e-learning platforms. Education and Information Technologies, 2022. 27(5): p. 5989-6014.
16-Francesco, C., D.S. Massimo, and P. Antonio, Evaluation Models for E-Learning Platform: an AHP approach, in 36th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. 2006. p. 1-6.
17-Mohammed, H.J., M. Mat Kasim, and I.N. Mohd Shaharanee, Evaluation of E-Learning Approaches Using AHP-TOPSIS Technique. Journal of Telecommunication, 2018. 10: p. 7-10.
18-Ma, J., Z. Zhu, and X. Liu, Assessing the impact of information technology on modern learning approaches: AHP and TOPSIS analysis of blended, flipped, and E-learning. Soft Computing, 2023.
19-Maitra, S., et al., Multi-criteria Decision Making and Its Application to Online Learning Platform Selection During the COVID-19 Pandemic Based on TOPSIS Method, in Real Life Applications of Multiple Criteria Decision Making Techniques in Fuzzy Domain, L. Sahoo, T. Senapati, and R.R. Yager, Editors. 2023, Springer Nature Singapore: Singapore. p. 507-519.
20-Ayouni, S., et al., Fuzzy Vikor Application for Learning Management Systems Evaluation in Higher Education. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 2021. 17(2): p. 17-35.
21-نیک پور، ا.، م. همایون فر، و ا. دانشور، بررسی تحلیلی سیستم‌های مدیریت دوره در نظام آموزش الکترونیک. فناوری های آموزشی در یادگیری، 2022. 5(16): ص.51-77.
22-Gong, J.-W., et al., An integrated multi-criteria decision making approach with linguistic hesitant fuzzy sets for E-learning website evaluation and selection. Applied Soft Computing, 2021. 102: p. 107118.
23-Deng, J., Introduction to Grey System Theory The Journal of Grey System, 1989. 1(1): p. 1-24.
24-Hwang, C.L. and K.P. Yoon, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer-Verlag, 1981: p. 58-191.
25-Guo-Dong, L., Y. Daisuke, and N. Masatake, A grey-based decision-making approach to the supplier selection problem. An International Journal Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2007. 46(3): p. 573-581. 

  • Receive Date 29 July 2024
  • Revise Date 05 September 2024
  • Accept Date 10 September 2024
  • First Publish Date 18 September 2024
  • Publish Date 22 September 2024