Application of Wireless Sensor Networks for Monitoring and Protection of Rangelands and Natural Resources: A Preventive Approach to Natural Hazard Management

Bagherzadeh, Mohammad Ali; Soleimani-Nasab, Ehsan; Rahimi, Farzad

doi:10.48306/jumee.2024.484224.1059

Application of Wireless Sensor Networks for Monitoring and Protection of Rangelands and Natural Resources: A Preventive Approach to Natural Hazard Management

Authors

Mohammad Ali Bagherzadeh

Ehsan Soleimani-Nasab

Farzad Rahimi

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Graduate University of Advanced Technology

https://doi.org/10.48306/jumee.2024.484224.1059

Abstract

Monitoring and protecting rangelands and natural resource lands against natural hazards such as wildfires and floods are of paramount importance. Wireless sensor networks (WSNs), as innovative technologies, provide real-time management of these hazards. In this study, a monitoring system based on LoRaWAN technology was designed and evaluated for rangeland surveillance in remote and difficult-to-access areas of Iran. LoRaWAN was chosen as the optimal solution due to its long communication range, low power consumption, and the ability to establish private networks without the need for complex infrastructure. The proposed system consists of sensors that measure temperature, humidity, and smoke, with the collected data being transmitted to a central gateway. These data are then transferred via LoRa modules to a cloud server. One of the main challenges addressed in this study was energy optimization to extend the battery life of the sensors. To overcome this, smart algorithms were implemented to adjust the data transmission intervals based on environmental and seasonal conditions; for instance, during hot seasons and days with higher wildfire risk, shorter data transmission intervals were set, while in stable conditions, longer intervals were used. Field tests demonstrated that the proposed system was able to maintain stable communication over long distances while efficiently managing energy consumption to ensure reliable data transmission. Furthermore, the real-time data transfer to the cloud enables advanced analysis and timely decision-making. This research shows that LoRaWAN technology, with its easy access to equipment and resilience in harsh environmental conditions, offers an effective and efficient solution for monitoring and protecting rangelands and natural resource lands in Iran.

Keywords

Wireless sensor networks

LoRaWAN

Environmental monitoring

Energy management

Sensitive ecosystems

1.FAO, Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020. 2020, Rome, Italy ;: FAO. 184.

2.on Climate Change , I.P., Climate Change 2021 – The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2023: Cambridge University Press.

3.Global Environment Outlook – GEO-6: Healthy Planet, Healthy People. 2019: Cambridge University Press.

4.(IUCN), I.U.f.C.o.N., World Conservation Report 2020: Overcoming Barriers to Protecting Nature. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. 2020.

5.Akyildiz, I.F., et al., Wireless sensor networks: a survey. Computer Networks, 2002. 38(4): p. 393-422.

6.Hart, J.K. and K. Martinez, Environmental Sensor Networks: A revolution in the earth system science? Earth-Science Reviews, 2006. 78(3–4): p. 177-191.

7.Buratti, C., et al., An Overview on Wireless Sensor Networks Technology and Evolution. Sensors, 2009. 9(9): p. 6869-6896.

8.Yick, J., B. Mukherjee, and D. Ghosal, Wireless sensor network survey. Computer Networks, 2008. 52(12): p. 2292-2330.

9.Raza, U., P. Kulkarni, and M. Sooriyabandara, Low Power Wide Area Networks: An Overview. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2017. 19(2): p. 855-873.

10.Zhang, Y., Energy Efficiency Management and Route Optimization for Wireless Sensor Network under the Ubiquitous Power Internet of Things. European Journal of Electrical Engineering, 2019. 21(2): p. 217-222.

11.Chang, F.-C. and H.-C. Huang, A Survey on Intelligent Sensor Network and Its Applications. J. Netw. Intell., 2016. 1(1): p. 1-15.

12.Fernández-Berni, J., et al., Early forest fire detection by vision-enabled wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 2012. 21(8): p. 938-949.

13.Watras, C.J., et al., Evaluation of wireless sensor networks (WSNs) for remote wetland monitoring: design and initial results. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2014. 186: p. 919-934.

14Lin, T.-H., et al. Development of Smart Stick for Soil Erosion Monitoring. in IGARSS 2019-2019 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. 2019. IEEE.

15.Mohapatra, A. and T. Trinh, Early Wildfire Detection Technologies in Practice—A Review. Sustainability, 2022. 14(19): p. 12270.

16.Verma, S., et al., Intelligent Framework Using IoT-Based WSNs for Wildfire Detection. IEEE Access, 2021. 9: p. 48185-48196.

17.Chernetskyi, B., V. Kharchenko, and A. Orehov, Wireless Sensor Network based Forest Fire Early Detection Systems: Development and Implementation. International Journal of Computing, 2022: p. 92-99.

18.Moradi, S., et al., Early Wildfire Detection using Different Machine Learning Algorithms. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 2024: p. 101346.

19.Pasi, A.A. and U. Bhave, Flood detection system using wireless sensor network. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, 2015. 5(2).

20.Thekkil, T.M. and N. Prabakaran. Real-time WSN based early flood detection and control monitoring system. in 2017 International Conference on Intelligent Computing, Instrumentation and Control Technologies (ICICICT). 2017.

21.Ahmed, D.T., M. Siddique, and M.S. Husain, Flood Monitoring and Early Warning Systems – An IoT Based Perspective. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Internet of Things, 2023. 9(2).

22.Wang, X., et al., Convergence of Edge Computing and Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2020. 22(2): p. 869-904.

23.Atzori, L., A. Iera, and G. Morabito, The Internet of Things: A survey. Computer Networks, 2010. 54(15): p. 2787-2805.

24.Sanchez-Iborra, R. and M.-D. Cano, State of the Art in LP-WAN Solutions for Industrial IoT Services. Sensors, 2016. 16(5): p. 708.

25.Alagarsamy, G., J. Shanthini, and G. Naveen Balaji, A Survey on Technologies and Challenges of LPWA for Narrowband IoT, in Trends in Cloud-based IoT. 2020, Springer International Publishing. p. 73-84.

26.Botta, A., et al., Integration of Cloud computing and Internet of Things: A survey. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2016. 56: p. 684-700.

27.Khan, M.A. and K. Salah, IoT security: Review, blockchain solutions, and open challenges. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2018. 82: p. 395-411.

28.Anastasi, G., et al., Energy conservation in wireless sensor networks: A survey. Ad Hoc Networks, 2009. 7(3): p. 537-568.

29.Centelles, R.P., et al., Beyond the Star of Stars: An Introduction to Multihop and Mesh for LoRa and LoRaWAN. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 2021. 20(2): p. 63-72.

30.Sinha, R.S., Y. Wei, and S.-H. Hwang, A survey on LPWA technology: LoRa and NB-IoT. ICT Express, 2017. 3(1): p. 14-21.

31.Almuhaya, M.A.M., et al., A Survey on LoRaWAN Technology: Recent Trends, Opportunities, Simulation Tools and Future Directions. Electronics, 2022. 11(1): p. 164.

32.Villa-Henriksen, A., et al., Internet of Things in arable farming: Implementation, applications, challenges and potential. Biosystems Engineering, 2020. 191: p. 60-84.

33.Li, S., L.D. Xu, and S. Zhao, 5G Internet of Things: A survey. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 2018. 10: p. 1-9.

34.Abbasian Dehkordi, S., et al., A survey on data aggregation techniques in IoT sensor networks. Wireless Networks, 2019. 26(2): p. 1243-1263.

35.Mekki, K., et al., A comparative study of LPWAN technologies for large-scale IoT deployment. ICT Express, 2019. 5(1): p. 1-7.

36.Tsai, C.-W., et al., Data Mining for Internet of Things: A Survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2014. 16(1): p. 77-97.

37.Wu, M., et al. Research on the architecture of Internet of Things. in 2010 3rd International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering(ICACTE). 2010. IEEE.

38.Ashween, R., B. Ramakrishnan, and M. Milton Joe, Energy Efficient Data Gathering Technique Based on Optimal Mobile Sink Node Selection for Improved Network Life Time in Wireless Sensor Network (WSN). Wireless Personal Communications, 2020. 113(4): p. 2107-2126.

39.Tchuani Tchakonté, D., E. Simeu, and M. Tchuente, Lifetime optimization of wireless sensor networks with sleep mode energy consumption of sensor nodes. Wireless Networks, 2018. 26(1): p. 91-100.

40.Sarmasti, Z., et al., FDCD: Fault Detection Method in Clustered WSN Based on Distributed Mode. AdHoc \& Sensor Wireless Networks, 2022. 52.

41.Sudevalayam, S. and P. Kulkarni, Energy Harvesting Sensor Nodes: Survey and Implications. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2011. 13(3): p. 443-461.

42.Yakine, F. and A. Kenzi, Energy Harvesting in wireless communication: A survey. E3S Web of Conferences, 2022. 336: p. 00074.

43.Behera, T.M., et al., Energy-Efficient Routing Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks: Architectures, Strategies, and Performance. Electronics, 2022. 11(15): p. 2282.

44.Wang, K., et al., Green Industrial Internet of Things Architecture: An Energy-Efficient Perspective. IEEE Communications Magazine, 2016. 54(12): p. 48-54.

45.Palattella, M.R., et al., Internet of Things in the 5G Era: Enablers, Architecture, and Business Models. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2016. 34(3): p. 510-527.

46.Farahzadi, A., et al., Middleware technologies for cloud of things: a survey. Digital Communications and Networks, 2018. 4(3): p. 176-188.

47.Akbas, A., et al., Joint Optimization of Transmission Power Level and Packet Size for WSN Lifetime Maximization. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2016. 16(12): p. 5084-5094.

48.Centenaro, M., et al., Long-range communications in unlicensed bands: The rising stars in the IoT and smart city scenarios. IEEE Wireless Communications, 2016. 23(5): p. 60-67.