Modeling and determination of optimal conditions for nickel removal from aqueous solutions using walnut peel extract-modified biochar

Hadavand, Mahsa; Saffari, Mahboub

doi:10.48306/jumee.2024.460518.1047

Modeling and determination of optimal conditions for nickel removal from aqueous solutions using walnut peel extract-modified biochar

Authors

Mahsa Hadavand ¹

Mahboub Saffari ²

¹ M.Sc. Graduate, Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University

² Department of Environment, Institute of Science and High Technology and Environmental Sciences, Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.48306/jumee.2024.460518.1047

Abstract

In the present study, cypress cone raw biochar was modified using walnut peel extract under the chemical modification process and its performance optimization on nickel (Ni) removal in aqueous solutions was affected by various factors was evaluated using the RSM. Contrary to expectation, chemical modification caused a decrease in the specific surface area and a decrease in effective functional groups in Ni removal (functional groups containing oxygen and C-C) compared to the non-modified biochar sample. The investigations of Ni removal by modified biochar also showed a significant reduction of Ni removal by this adsorbent in the same conditions compared to the non-amended sample, so that the average amount of Ni removal in the same conditions in the non-modified adsorbent was 1.8 times more than modified biochar. The investigation of the factors affecting the removal of Ni in two modified and non-modified adsorbents showed that with the increase of the initial concentration of Ni, the removal of Ni had a decreasing trend; while with the increase of other factors, Ni removal showed a relatively increasing trend. The results of the present study show that the modification and engineering of biochars by the mentioned chemical method, with the effect of reducing the physical absorption (reduction the specific surface area) and chemical adsorption (reduction of the intensity of the active groups affecting the adsorption), caused the reduction of Ni removal efficiency compared to the raw sample, which challenges the hypothesis of constant increase of heavy metal removal efficiency by chemical modification of biochar.

Keywords

Biochar

Chemical modification

Nickel

Box-Benken model

Aqueous solutions

1.Kumar, S., Prasad, S., Yadav, K. K., Shrivastava, M., Gupta, N., Nagar, S., and Malav, L. C., Hazardous heavy metals contamination of vegetables and food chain: Role of sustainable remediation approaches-A review. Environmental research, 2019. 179: p. 108792.

2.El-Naggar, A., Ahmed, N., Mosa, A., Niazi, N. K., Yousaf, B., Sharma, A., ... and Chang, S. X., Nickel in soil and water: Sources, biogeochemistry, and remediation using biochar. Journal of hazardous materials, 2021. 419: p. 126421.

3.Yadav, M., Singh, G., and Jadeja, R. N., Physical and chemical methods for heavy metal removal. Pollutants and Water Management: Resources, Strategies and Scarcity, 2021. p. 377-397.

4. Zaimee, M. Z. A., Sarjadi, M. S., and Rahman, M. L., Heavy metals removal from water by efficient adsorbents. Water, 2021. 13(19): p. 2659.

5. Liu, Z., Xu, Z., Xu, L., Buyong, F., Chay, T. C., Li, Z., ... and Wang, X., Modified biochar: synthesis and mechanism for removal of environmental heavy metals. Carbon Research, 2022. 1(1): p. 8.

6. Qiu, B., Tao, X., Wang, H., Li, W., Ding, X., and Chu, H., Biochar as a low-cost adsorbent for aqueous heavy metal removal: A review. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2021. 155: p. 105081.

7. Herrera, K., Morales, L. F., Tarazona, N. A., Aguado, R., and Saldarriaga, J. F., Use of biochar from rice husk pyrolysis: Part A: Recovery as an adsorbent in the removal of emerging compounds. ACS omega, 2022. 7(9): p. 7625-7637.

8.Xie, Y., Wang, L., Li, H., Westholm, L. J., Carvalho, L., Thorin, E., and Skreiberg, Ø., A critical review on production, modification and utilization of biochar. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2022. 161: p. 105405.

9.Sharma, R. K., Singh, T. P., Mandal, S., Azad, D., and Kumar, S., Chemical treatments for biochar modification: opportunities, limitations and advantages. In Engineered Biochar: Fundamentals, Preparation, Characterization and Applications (pp. 65-84). 2022. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.

10.Vithanage, M., Rajapaksha, A. U., Zhang, M., Thiele-Bruhn, S., Lee, S. S., and Ok, Y. S., Acid-activated biochar increased sulfamethazine retention in soils. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2015. 22: p. 2175-2186.

11. Saffari, M., Optimization of nickel removal from aqueous solutions by physical-modified biochar. Iranian Journal of Health and Environment, 2023. 16(3) : p. 445-458.

12. Lizotte, D. J., Greiner, R., and Schuurmans, D., An experimental methodology for response surface optimization methods. Journal of Global Optimization, 2012. 53: p. 699-736.

13.Mahdi, Z., El Hanandeh, A., and Yu, Q. J., Preparation, characterization and application of surface modified biochar from date seed for improved lead, copper, and nickel removal from aqueous solutions. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2019. 7(5) : p. 103379.

14.Georgieva, V. G., Gonsalvesh, L., and Tavlieva, M. P., Thermodynamics and kinetics of the removal of nickel (II) ions from aqueous solutions by biochar adsorbent made from agro-waste walnut shells. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2020. 312: p. 112788.

15.Saffari, M., and Moazallahi, M. Assessing the efficiency of chemically modified biochars in removing nickel from aqueous solutions. Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research.2024. Accepted.

16.Zama, E. F., Reid, B. J., Arp, H. P. H., Sun, G. X., Yuan, H. Y., and Zhu, Y. G., Advances in research on the use of biochar in soil for remediation: a review. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2018. 18: p. 2433-2450.

17.Shen, Z., Zhang, Y., McMillan, O., Jin, F., and Al-Tabbaa, A., Characteristics and mechanisms of nickel adsorption on biochars produced from wheat straw pellets and rice husk. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2017. 24: p. 2809-12819.