Legal position of sustainable development in the legal system of global trade

Authors

1 Department of Public Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran , Tehran, Iran.

2 Tehran University.

3 Kerman Province, Jahad-Keshavarzi Organization

4 Isfahan Province, Jahad-Keshavarzi Organization

Abstract
In the twentieth century, with an emphasis on the principle of sovereign equality of states, a framework for global trade was established. Simultaneously, the importance of achieving balanced development between industrialized and developing countries was highlighted. This period witnessed the integration of development and global trade, alongside a significant increase in the production and international exchange of goods, which unfortunately caused considerable environmental damage. This situation revealed the necessity for more stringent environmental care and control within the structure of global trade. The concept of sustainable development emerged as a bridge between development and trade and quickly gained attention, leading to the formulation of multilateral environmental agreements within the framework of international environmental law. This article examines how sustainable development has been adopted and transformed into a global strategy, its influence on international policies, laws, and documents, and its implementation in international judicial processes. Nevertheless, the facilitation of environmental agreements by the rules of the world trade organization remains unclear, and the inconsistencies between trade practices and environmental measures have rendered the legitimacy and credibility of some of these actions ambiguous. This has led to conservatism and uncertainty in the implementation of environmental agreements, indicating that sustainable development can only be effectively applied in trade policies when it is integrated and intertwined with its constituent elements.

Keywords


1. Wallace-Bruce, N.L., Global trade and sustainable development: two steps forward in the WTO? Comparative and international law journal of Southern Africa, 2002. 35(2): p. 236-255.
2.  Khumalo, T.F., Sustainable development and international economic law in Africa. Law, Democracy & Development, 2020. 24(1): p. 133-157.
3.پور، ج. و توحیدی، جایگاه «توسعه پایدار» در حقوق بین‌الملل با تأکید بر رویه دولت‌ها. فصلنامه مطالعات حقوق عمومی دانشگاه تهران، 2021. 51(2): ص.641-660.
4.  Aseeva, A., (Un) sustainable development (s) in international economic law: A quest for sustainability. Sustainability, 2018. 10(11): p. 4022.
5.شهبازی و آرامش، «توسعه پایدار» یا «پایداری توسعه» در حقوق بین‌الملل. مجله حقوقی بین المللی، 2010. 27(شماره 42 (بهار و تابستان)): ص.125-139.
6.دبیری، ]ودیگران[. دست‌یابی به توسعه پایدار از منظر حقوق بین الملل محیط زیست. انسان و محیط زیست، 2018. 16(1): ص.63-73.
7.  Handl, G., Declaration of the United Nations conference on the human environment (Stockholm Declaration), 1972 and the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, 1992. United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law, 2012. 11(6): p. 1-11.
8.  World Conservation Strategy : living resource conservation for sustainable development / prepared by the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN). 1980.
9.  Resolutions and Decisions adopted by the General Assembly during its 36th session: GAOR, 36th Session, Supplement No. 51. 15 September – 18 December 1981; 16-29 March, 28 April and 20 September 1982.
10.Assembly, U.G., Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development : draft resolution / submitted by the Vice-Chairman of the Committee, Henricus Gajentaan, Netherlands, on the basis of informal consultations held on the draft resolution contained in section 3 of document A/C.2/42/L.19. 25 Nov. 1987.
11.Antrim, L.N., The United Nations conference on environment and development, in The Diplomatic Record 1992-1993. 2019, Routledge. p. 189-210.
12.Shelton, D., Stockholm Declaration (1972) and Rio Declaration (1992). Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, 2008.
13.Voigt, C., Sustainable development as a principle of international law: resolving conflicts between climate measures and WTO law. Vol. 2. 2009: Brill.
14.Yamin, F., The CSD reporting process: A quiet step forward for sustainable development, in Year Book of International Co-operation on Environment and Development. 2018, Routledge. p. 51-62.
15.Trzyna, T.C., A sustainable world: defining and measuring sustainable development. 1995.
16.Frenz, W., et al., Europarecht. 2016: Springer.
17.Convention, E., Draft treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe – Adopted by consensus by the European Convention on 13 June and 10 July 2003 – Submitted to the President of the European Council in Rome - 18 July 2003. 2003: Publications Office.
18.French, D.A., Climate Change Law: Narrowing the Focus, Broadening the Debate, in Sustainable Justice. 2004, Brill Nijhoff. p. 273-283.
19.UN. Report of the Global Conference on the Sustainable Development of Small Island Developing States. in Global Conference on the Sustainable Development of Small Island Developing States. 1994.
20.Declaration, M., Ministerial Conference. Fourth Session, Doha, 2001: p. 9-14.
21.Summit, J., World summit on sustainable development. Johannesburg, South Africa, 2002. 9(3): p. 67-69.
22.طیبی، س.، دیپلماسی محیط زیست و حقوق بین الملل توسعه پایدار. 1395: انتشارات مجد.
23. Arbitration Regarding the Iron Rhine Railway (Belgium v. Netherlands). 200.5
24.Fisher, E., B. Richardson, and S. Wood, Environmental Law for Sustainability: A Critical Reader. 2005, Hart Publishing.
25.Boyle, A.E. and C. Redgwell, Birnie, Boyle, and Redgwell's international Law and the environment. 2021: Oxford University Press.
26.Lowe, V., The Politics of Law-Making: Are the Method and Character of Norm Creation Changing? The Role of Law in International Politics: Essays in International Relations and International Law, 2000. 207: p. 226.
27. Marong, A., From Rio to Johannesburg: Reflections on the role of international legal norms in sustainable development. Geo. Int'l Envtl. L. Rev., 2003. 16: p. 21.
28.Sands, P., International Courts and the Application of the Concept of ‘sustainable Development', in Law and Development. 2012, Routledge-Cavendish. p. 147-157.
29.Winter, R.L., Reconciling the GATT and WTO with Multilateral Environmental Agreements: Can we have our cake and eat it too. Colo. J. Int'l Envtl. L. & Pol'y, 2000. 11: p. 223.
30.Kimbrell, A., J. Mander, and E. Goldsmith, The Case Against the Global Economy: And for a Turn Toward the Local. 1996.
31.Schoenbaum, T., International trade and environmental protection. International law and the environment, 2002: p. 697-750.
32.Stilwell, M. and E. Turk, Trade measures and multilateral environmental agreements: resolving uncertainty and removing the WTO chill factor. Discussion Papers. Geneva: WWF, 1999.
33.González-Calatayud, A. and G. Marceau, The Relationship between the Dispute-Settlement Mechanisms of MEAs and those of the WTO. Rev. Eur. Comp. & Int'l Envtl. L., 2002. 11: p. 275.
34.Rege, V., GATT law and environment-related issues affecting the trade of developing countries. J. World Trade, 1994. 28: p. 95.
35.Van den Bossche, P., The law and policy of the World Trade Organization: text, cases and materials. 2008: Cambridge University Press.
36.Oesch, M. and B. Facts, US-Shrimp Case. Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2014.
37.Gray, K.R., Brazil—Measures Affecting Imports of Retreaded Tyres. American Journal of International Law, 2008. 102(3): p. 610-616.
38.Association, I.L., Berlin Conference (2004). Water resources law, 2004: p. 3-55.
39.Pallemaerts, M., International law and sustainable development: Any progress in Johannesburg. Rev. Eur. Comp. & Int'l Envtl. L., 2003. 12: p. 1.

  • Receive Date 05 May 2024
  • Revise Date 07 June 2024
  • Accept Date 10 June 2024
  • First Publish Date 11 June 2024
  • Publish Date 21 June 2024