Evaluating the efficiency of sodium alginate hydrogels cross-linked with ferric chloride on the removal of nickel from aqueous solutions

Alavi, Ensieh Alsadat; Modiri, Sina; Saffari, Mahboub; Yari, Hossein

doi:10.48306/jumee.2023.425900.1025

Evaluating the efficiency of sodium alginate hydrogels cross-linked with ferric chloride on the removal of nickel from aqueous solutions

Authors

Ensieh Alsadat Alavi ¹

Sina Modiri ¹

Mahboub Saffari ²

Hossein Yari ³

¹ Polymer Engineering Group, Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Department, Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman, Iran

² Department of Environment, Institute of Science and High Technology and Environmental Sciences, Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman, Iran

³ Department of Surface Coatings and Corrosion, Institute for Color Science and Technology (ICST), Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.48306/jumee.2023.425900.1025

Abstract

In recent years, research on the widespread use of biodegradable polymers, such as sodium alginate (SA), in removing pollutants from water sources has shown significant growth. The present study aims to evaluate the efficiency of SA hydrogels cross-linked with ferric chloride (for mechanical strength) in optimizing the removal of nickel (Ni) from aqueous solutions. Various factors, including Ni initial concentration, solution pH, amount of adsorbent, and contact time, were considered using response surface methodology (Box-Benken model). Based on the results of FTIR and SEM analyses, activated SA hydrogels were found to have hydroxyl and carboxyl functional groups, and their surface morphology was non-flat and prominent. The Ni removal values in the presence of SA hydrogels varied, with the minimum and maximum removal percentages being 53.39% and 85.43%, respectively. Increasing the initial Ni concentration resulted in a decreasing trend in Ni removal, while increasing contact time, solution pH, and amount of adsorbent led to an increasing trend in Ni removal. The evaluation of the data obtained from Ni removal using the Box-Benken model showed an accurate prediction (R² higher than 0.98%) in optimizing Ni removal from aqueous solutions in the presence of SA. The possible mechanisms of Ni removal by SA hydrogel were identified as the formation of Van der waals bonds (physical adsorption), interaction with carboxylate anions, chelate formation between Ni ions and hydroxyl functional groups, and electrostatic interactions (due to the negative surface charge of SA). Overall, the results of this study demonstrate that SA has a suitable ability to remove Ni from aqueous solutions. However, future studies should investigate, compare, and integrate other activation methods, such as physical activation (combination with inorganic substances) and chemical activation (surface grafting) on the SA polymer, to improve the removal efficiency of heavy elements using this polymer.

Keywords

Polymer

Surface adsorption

Heavy metals

Response surface methodology

Aqueous solutions

1. Gautam, P. K., Gautam, R. K., Banerjee, S., Chattopadhyaya, M. C., and Pandey, J. D., Heavy metals in the environment: fate, transport, toxicity and remediation technologies. Nova Sci Publishers, 2016. 60: p. 101-130.

2. Mishra, S., Bharagava, R. N., More, N., Yadav, A., Zainith, S., Mani, S., and Chowdhary, P., Heavy metal contamination: an alarming threat to environment and human health. Environmental biotechnology: For sustainable future, 2019. P. 103-125.

3. Das, K. K., Reddy, R. C., Bagoji, I. B., Das, S., Bagali, S., Mullur, L., and Biradar, M. S., Primary concept of nickel toxicity–an overview. Journal of basic and clinical physiology and pharmacology, 2018. ۳۰(2): p. 141-152.

4. Genchi, G., Carocci, A., Lauria, G., Sinicropi, M. S., and Catalano, A., Nickel: Human health and environmental toxicology. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. 17(3): p. 679.

5. Saleh, T. A., Mustaqeem, M., & Khaled, M., Water treatment technologies in removing heavy metal ions from wastewater: A review. Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management, 2022. 17: p. 100617.

6. De Gisi, S., Lofrano, G., Grassi, M., and Notarnicola, M., Characteristics and adsorption capacities of low-cost sorbents for wastewater treatment: A review. Sustainable Materials and Technologies, 2016. 9: p. 10-40.

7. Ahmad, M., Ahmed, S., Swami, B. L., and Ikram, S., Adsorption of heavy metal ions: role of chitosan and cellulose for water treatment. Langmuir, 2015. 79: p. 109-155.

8. Ahmad, A., Mubarak, N. M., Jannat, F. T., Ashfaq, T., Santulli, C., Rizwan, M., and Ali, S., A critical review on the synthesis of natural sodium alginate based composite materials: An innovative biological polymer for biomedical delivery applications. Processes, 2021. 9(1): p. 137.

9. Roquero, D. M., Othman, A., Melman, A., and Katz, E., Iron (III)-cross-linked alginate hydrogels: A critical review. Materials Advances, 2022. 3(4): p. 1849-1873.

10. Gao, X., Guo, C., Hao, J., Zhao, Z., Long, H., and Li, M., Adsorption of heavy metal ions by sodium alginate based adsorbent-a review and new perspectives. International journal of biological macromolecules, 2020. 164: p. 4423-4434.

11. Lakouraj, M. M., Mojerlou, F., and Zare, E. N., Nanogel and superparamagnetic nanocomposite based on sodium alginate for sorption of heavy metal ions. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2014. 106: p. 34-41.

12. Thakur, S., Sharma, B., Verma, A., Chaudhary, J., Tamulevicius, S., and Thakur, V. K., Recent progress in sodium alginate based sustainable hydrogels for environmental applications. Journal of cleaner production, 2018. 198: p. 143-159.

13. Khuri, A. I., and Mukhopadhyay, S., Response surface methodology. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 2010. 2(2): p. 128-149.

14. Daemi, H., and Barikani, M., Synthesis and characterization of calcium alginate nanoparticles, sodium homopolymannuronate salt and its calcium nanoparticles. Scientia Iranica, 2012. 19(6): p. 2023-2028.

15. Lagoa, R., and Rodrigues, J. R., Kinetic analysis of metal uptake by dry and gel alginate particles. Biochemical engineering journal, 2009. 46(3): p. 320-326.

16. Papageorgiou, S. K., Katsaros, F. K., Favvas, E. P., Romanos, G. E., Athanasekou, C. P., Beltsios, K. G. and Falaras, P., Alginate fibers as photocatalyst immobilizing agents applied in hybrid photocatalytic/ultrafiltration water treatment processes. Water research, 2012. 46(6): p. 1858-1872.

17. Esmat, M., Farghali, A. A., Khedr, M. H., and El-Sherbiny, I. M., Alginate-based nanocomposites for efficient removal of heavy metal ions. International journal of biological macromolecules, 2017. 102: p. 272-283.

18. Esmaeili, A., and Khoshnevisan, N., Optimization of process parameters for removal of heavy metals by biomass of Cu and Co-doped alginate-coated chitosan nanoparticles. Bioresource Technology, 2016. 218: p. 650-658.

19.Zhu, H., Fu, Y., Jiang, R., Yao, J., Xiao, L., & Zeng, G., Optimization of copper (II) adsorption onto novel magnetic calcium alginate/maghemite hydrogel beads using response surface methodology. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2014. 53(10): p. 4059-4066.

20. Wang, M., Wang, Z., Zhou, X., & Li, S., Efficient removal of heavy metal ions in wastewater by using a novel alginate-EDTA hybrid aerogel. Applied Sciences, 2019. 9(3): p. 547.

21. Abd-Elhamid, A. I., Elgoud, E. A., & Aly, H. F., Alginate modified graphene oxide for rapid and effective sorption of some heavy metal ions from an aqueous solution. Cellulose, 2022. 29(11): p. 6231-6245.

22. Wang, J., & Chen, C., Chitosan-based biosorbents: modification and application for biosorption of heavy metals and radionuclides. Bioresource Technology, 2014. 160: p. 129-141.

23. Gao, X., Guo, C., Hao, J., Zhao, Z., Long, H., & Li, M., Adsorption of heavy metal ions by sodium alginate based adsorbent-a review and new perspectives. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2020. 164: p. 4423-4434.

24. Guibal, E., Interactions of metal ions with chitosan-based sorbents: a review. Separation and Purification Technology, 2004. 38(1): p. 43-74.

25. Fomina, M., & Gadd, G. M., Biosorption: current perspectives on concept, definition and application. Bioresource Technology, 2014. 160: p. 3-14.

26. Volesky, B., Removal and recovery of heavy metals. Biosorption of Heavy Metals, 1990. 7-43.

27. Tran, H. N., Nguyen, D. T., Le, G. T., Tomul, F., Lima, E. C., Woo, S. H., ... & Chao, H. P., Adsorption mechanism of hexavalent chromium onto layered double hydroxides-based adsorbents: A systematic in-depth review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2019. 373: p. 258-270.

28.Dambies, L., Guimon, C., Yiacoumi, S., & Guibal, E., Characterization of metal ion interactions with chitosan by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2001. 177(2-3): p. 203-214.

29. Shuibo, I. E., Yi, D. U. A. N., & Yingjiu, L. I. U., Characteristics and mechanism of uranium (Ⅵ) adsorption on glutaraldehyde crosslinked humic acid-immobilized sodium alginate porous membrane. CIESC Journal, 2013. 64(7): p. 2488-2496.

30. Baoe, W., Weichang, X., Shuibo, X., & Yangbin, G., Study on biosorption of uranium by alginate immobilized saccharomyces cerevisiae. Uranium Mining and Metallurgy, 2005. 24.

31. Yu, J., Wang, J., & Jiang, Y., Removal of uranium from aqueous solution by alginate beads. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 2017. 49(3): p. 534-540.

32. Thakur, A. K., & Kumar, M., Efficacy of green alginate beads for multi-metal removal from aqueous solution. Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering, 2021. 3: p. 100100.

33. Yilmaz, T., Maldonado, L., Turasan, H., and Kokini, J., Thermodynamic mechanism of particulation of sodium alginate and chitosan polyelectrolyte complexes as a function of charge ratio and order of addition. Journal of Food Engineering, 2019. 254: p. 42-50.

34. Yu, J., Wang, J., & Jiang, Y., Removal of uranium from aqueous solution by alginate beads. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 2017. 49(3): p. 534-540.