Environmental assessment of transportation railway by Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Model (Case study: Kerman province)

Authors

1 Faculty of Civil, University of Azad Islamic, Tehran, Iran

2 Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract
Kerman province is a mineral and industrial region undergoing progress and development. Due to the growth of industries and the location of Kerman province in a strategic position, transportation systems, and environmental effects have received much attention. In this study, using life cycle assessment, the environmental effects of the rail and cargo fleet in Kerman province have been investigated. At first, the required information on the transportation of goods for the periods of one and five years was collected in the operation phase, and by using the OPENLCA software, the steps related to the life cycle assessment were carried out. Based on the CML baseline method, which is one of the most comprehensive evaluation methods in this software, the environmental effects of produced pollutants and consumed resources during the life cycle of two scenarios with a one-year and five-year time period were determined and calculated in 11 effect classes. These studies, which were carried out in the direction of sustainable development and environmental protection, provide the necessary information on the transportation of goods for a one-year and five-year period and its effect on the various effect points of acidification, climate change, destruction of aquatic resources - elements, final reserves. Taking aquatic resources, fossil fuels, eutrophication, freshwater toxicity, human toxicity, marine
aquatic toxicity, ozone layer destruction, photochemical smog, and soil toxicity showed. Therefore, the need for serious and detailed planning to overcome the aforementioned crises is felt more and more.

Keywords


 1.Dobruszkes, F. and M. Givoni, Competition, integration, substitution: Myths and realities concerning the relationship between high-speed rail and air transport in Europe, in sustainable aviation futures. 2013, Emerald Group Publishing Limited. p. 175-197.  https://doi.org/10.1108/S2044-9941(2013)0000004008
2. Chen, Z., et al., The impact of high-speed rail investment on economic and environmental change in China: A dynamic CGE analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2016. 92: p. 232-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.08.006 
3. Wang, L., et al., Accessibility impact of the present and future high-speed rail network: A case study of Jiangsu Province, China. Journal of Transport Geography, 2016. 54: p. 161-172.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.05.015 
4. Chen, J., High-speed rail and energy consumption in China: The intermediary roles of industry and technology. Energy, 2021. 230: p. 120816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120816
5. Celauro, C., et al., Environmentally appraising different pavement and construction scenarios: A comparative analysis for a typical local road. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2015. 34: p. 41-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.10.001 
6. Hoxha, E., et al. Life cycle assessment (LCA) to evaluate the environmental impacts of urban roads: a literature review. in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2020. IOP Publishing. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/588/3/032032 
7. ISO, Environmental Managementdlife Cycle AssessmentdPrinciples and Framework, ISO 14040:2006(E). International Organization for Standardisation, 2006a . 
8. Shams Fallah, F., et al., Investigation of solid waste disposal alternatives in Lavan Island using life cycle assessment approach. International Journal of Environmental Research, 2012. 7(1): p. 155-164. DOI: 10.22059/IJER.2012.594
9. Mohammadi, F., et al., Life cycle assessment (LCA) of the energetic use of bagasse in Iranian sugar  industry. Renewable Energy, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.06.023 
10. Reinhard, J. and R. Zah, Global environmental consequences of increased biodiesel consumption in Switzerland: consequential life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2009. 17: p. S46-S56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.05.003 
11. Stripple, H. and S. Uppenberg, Life cycle assessment of railways and rail transports-Application in environmental product declarations (EPDs) for the Bothnia Line. 2010, IVL Svenska Miljöinstitutet.  
12. Chester, M. and A. Horvath, Life-cycle assessment of high-speed rail: the case of California. Environmental research letters, 2010. 5(1): p. 014003. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/5/1/014003 
13. Åkerman, J., Transport systems meeting long-term climate targets: A backcasting approach. 2011, KTH Royal Institute of Technology. (Doctoral dissertation, KTH Royal Institute of Technology). 
14. Celauro, C., A. Cardella, and M. Guerrieri, LCA of Different Construction Choices for a Double Track Railway Line for Sustainability Evaluations. Sustainability, 2023. 15(6): p. 5066. DOI: 10.3390/su15065066 
15. Bilgili, L., et al., Evaluation of railway versus highway emissions using LCA approach between the two cities of Middle Anatolia. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2019. 49  :p. 101635 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101635 
16. Hauschild, M.Z., Introduction to LCA methodology. Life cycle assessment: Theory and practice, 2018: p. 59-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56475-3_6 
17. Winter, S., et al., openLCA 1.4-Comprehensive User Manual. GreenDelta GmbH, Berlin, Germany, 2015: p. 1-81 . 
18. Li, X.-J. and  Y.-d. Zheng, Using LCA to research carbon footprint for precast concrete piles during the building construction stage: A China study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020. 245: p. 118754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118754 
19. Klöpffer, W. and B. Grahl, Life cycle assessment (LCA): a guide  to best practice. 2014: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Receive Date 20 June 2023
  • Revise Date 04 August 2023
  • Accept Date 15 August 2023
  • First Publish Date 15 August 2023
  • Publish Date 22 June 2023