Assessment of the effect of the tailings dam on the quality of surface and underground water in Takht-e-Gonbad copper mining area

Authors

1 Department of Environment, Institute of Science and High Technology and Environmental Sciences, Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman, Iran

2 Department of Ecology, Institute of Science and High Technology and Environmental Sciences, Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman, Iran

Abstract
Materials in tailings dams that contain major ions and heavy metals lead to the release of toxic metals and acid production with the presence of oxygen, which has a high potential for pollution and has an adverse effect on the quality of surface and underground waters. In this research, the effect of tailings dam on zinc on the changes of manganese, molybdenum and arsenic in surface and underground waters of Takht-e-Gonbad copper mining area has been studied. Number of 11 samples were taken from different parts of the tailings dam area, these studies were carried out on
surface and underground water in two dry and wet seasons. The concentration of heavy metals such as manganese, molybdenum, and arsenic were investigated and the related graphs were drawn and interpreted using Arc GIS software. Then the monitoring of underground water pollution in the mining area was investigated. The concentration of manganese in the drainage of the sedimentation dam, tailings dam water No. 3, and mine pit water is slightly higher than the environmental standard. The highest amount of molybdenum is found in the dry season and in mine peat. The concentration of arsenic in the wet season in all samples is below the standard limit, and in the dry season, this amount is more than the drinking standard of Iran. Based on the instructions of the Environmental Protection Organization and according to the existing conditions, it is suggested to dig 17 observation wells with a maximum depth of 50 meters as 1st grade monitoring wells around the tailings dam of Takht-e-Gonbad copper mine.

Keywords


1.Adriano DC. Trace elements in terrestrial environments: biogeochemistry, bioavailability, and risks of metals: Springer; 2001. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21510-5
2.Hudson-Edwards K, Edwards S. Mineralogical controls on storage of As, Cu, Pb and Zn at the abandoned Mathiatis massive sulphide mine, Cyprus. Mineralogical Magazine. 2005;69(5):695-706. https://doi.org/10.1180/0026461056950281
3.Fuge R, Pearce FM, Pearce NJ, Perkins WT. Geochemistry of Cd in the secondary environment near abandoned metalliferous mines, Wales. Applied geochemistry. 1993;8:29-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-2927(09)80006-1
4. Lowson RT. Aqueous oxidation of pyrite by molecular oxygen. Chemical reviews. 1982;82(5):461-97. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00051a001
5.Nordstrom DK, Alpers CN, Ptacek CJ, Blowes DW. Negative pH and extremely acidic mine waters from Iron Mountain, California. Environmental Science & Technology. 2000;34(2):254-58. https://doi.org/10.1021/es990646v
6.Jambor J, Weisener C. The geochemistry of acid mine drainage. Environmental geochemistry. 2005;9:149.
7.Nieto J, Sarmiento A, Olías M, Cánovas C, Ayora C, editors. Acid mine drainage pollution in the Tinto and Odiel rivers, SW Spain. 12th Symposium on Water-Rock Interaction (Kunming, China). Abs; 2007. dOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2006.11.010
8.Shayestehfar M, Nasab SK, Mohammadalizadeh H. Mineralogy, petrology, and chemistry studies to evaluate oxide copper ores for heap leaching in Sarcheshmeh copper mine, Kerman, Iran. Journal of hazardous materials. 2008;154(1-3): 602-12. dOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.100
9.Lottermoser B. Mine wastes: characterization, treatment and environmental impacts. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer; 2003. dOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-12419-8
10.Mudd G, Boger D. The ever growing case for paste and thickened tailings—towards more sustainable mine waste management. J. Aust. Inst. Min. Metall. 2013;2:56-59.
11.Azizli KM, Yau TC, Birrel J. Design of the Lohan tailings dam, Mamut copper mining Sdn. Bhd., Malaysia. Minerals engineering. 1995;8(6):705-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/0892-6875(95)00031-K
12.van der Ent A, Edraki M. Environmental geochemistry of the abandoned Mamut copper mine (Sabah) Malaysia. Environmental geochemistry and health. 2018;40(1):189-207. https://doi: 10.1007/s10653-016-9892-3
13.Rice EW, Baird RB, Eaton AD, Clesceri LS. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater: American public health association Washington, DC; 2012.
14.Kohl PM, Medlar SJ. Occurrence of manganese in drinking water and manganese control: American Water Works Association; 2006.
15.Pontér C, Ingri J, Burman J-O, Boström K. Temporal variations in dissolved and suspended iron and manganese in the Kalix River, northern Sweden. Chemical geology. 1990;81(1-2):121-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(90)90042-6
16.Hosseini MR, Ghaderi M, Alirezaei S, Sun W. Geological characteristics and geochronology of the Takht-e-Gonbad copper deposit, SE Iran: a variant of porphyry type deposits. Ore Geology Reviews. 2017;86:440-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2017.03.003
17.Nriagu J, Bhattacharya P, Mukherjee A, Bundschuh J, Zevenhoven R, Loeppert R. Arsenic in soil and groundwater: an overview. Trace Metals and other Contaminants in the Environment. 2007;9:3-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1875-1121(06)09001-8
18.Antunes I, Albuquerque M. Using indicator kriging for the evaluation of arsenic potential contamination in an abandoned mining area (Portugal). Science of the Total Environment. 2013;442:545-52 .https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.10.010
19.Pais I, Jones Jr JB. The handbook of trace elements: Crc Press; 1997.
20.Khadem Min, Golchin A. Risk Assessment of Contamination of the Country's Soil and Water Resources with Arsenic. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research. 2019; 50(7); 1595-1617  (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22059/IJSWR.2019.274404.668103

  • Receive Date 26 May 2023
  • Revise Date 17 June 2023
  • Accept Date 15 August 2023
  • First Publish Date 15 August 2023
  • Publish Date 22 June 2023