Evaluating the role of integrated urban management in improving the urban environment of Tabriz using structural equation modeling

Authors

Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Ast, C, Islamic Azad University, Astara, Iran.

Abstract
In recent years, Tabriz has faced growing environmental challenges such as air pollution, incompatible land uses, poor waste management, and declining per capita green space, negatively affecting public health and ecological resilience. Institutional fragmentation, weak coordination among agencies, and sectoral policymaking are major barriers to effective environmental management. This study assessed the role of integrated urban management in improving environmental quality through a quantitative survey and structural equation modeling using SmartPLS. Data were purposively collected from 92 managers and experts, and measurement validity and reliability were confirmed. Results revealed that integrated urban management influences environmental quality indirectly through a sequential chain. Path coefficients were: integrated urban management → institutional cohesion (β = 0.48), institutional cohesion → environmental governance (β = 0.52), environmental governance → spatial justice (β = 0.45), and spatial justice → environmental quality (β = 0.50), all significant at p < 0.001. The coefficient of determination (R²) for environmental quality was 0.60, and Q² was 0.31, indicating good predictive power. The overall model fit (GOF = 0.58) confirmed adequacy. Strengthening institutional capacity, enhancing intersectoral coordination, and adopting spatial justice-oriented planning can significantly improve environmental quality in Tabriz. These findings provide a policy-relevant framework that can guide sustainable urban planning in other metropolitan areas with similar environmental challenges.

Keywords


1.     Zeynali Azim, A., Monadi, A., Zarbakhsh, F. Monadi, M. A. Structural Analysis of the Factors Influencing Smart Environmental Development in the City of Tabriz. Journal of Urban Environmental Management, 2025; 3(1): 56-73. https://doi.org/10.48306/juem.2025.528698.1076.
2.     Shahhoseini, H., Zamani, H., Mousavi Samimi, P. A Review of Biological Studies and their Relation with Environmental Sustainability. Soffeh, 2024; 34(2): 69-84. https://doi.org/10.48308/sofeh.2024.104642.
3.     Mirza Zadeh, A. Investigating urban management and its role in sustainable urban development. Geography and Human Relationships, 2022; 5(2): 21-33. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.26453851.1401.5.2.2.3.
4.     Dorado-Rubín, M.J., Guerrero-Mayo, M.J. & Navarro-Yáñez, C.J. Policy integration in urban policies as multi-level policy mixes. Policy Sci, 2025: 58, 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-024-09562-5. 
5.     Haou, E., Allarané, N., Aholou, C. C., & Bondoro, O. Integrating Sustainable Development Goals into Urban Planning to Advance Sustainability in Sub-Saharan Africa: Barriers and Practical Solutions from the Case Study of Moundou, Chad. Urban Science, 2025: 9(2), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci9020022.  
6.     Kramer, J., Silverton, S., & Späth, P. (2024). Urban governance arrangements for sustainability and justice. Urban Transformations, 6, Article 6. https://urbantransformations.biomedcentral.com. 
7.     Yigitcanlar, T., Corchado, J. M., & Mehmood, R. Smart city governance for sustainable urban development. Cities, 2022, 124, 103618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103618.
8.Shmelev, S. E., & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2021). Integrated environmental management for sustainable cities. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 64(12), 2175–2194. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2020.1828842. 
9.     Agyeman, J., Bullard, R. D., & Evans, B. (2023). Just sustainabilities: Policy, planning, and practice. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262046789.001.0001.
10. UN-Habitat. (2024). Integrated urban environmental management: Guidelines for sustainable cities. Nairobi: United Nations Human Settlements Programme. https://unjobs.org/organizations/un-habitat.
11. Moreno-Pires, S., Fidélis, T., & Ramos, T. B. (2021). The role of local environmental governance in implementing the SDGs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 314, 127965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127965.
12. Fischer, L. B., & Newig, J. (2022). Importance of participation in local environmental governance for achieving environmental justice. Environmental Policy and Governance, 32(3), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1989.
13. Frantzeskaki, N., McPhearson, T., & Collier, M. J. (2022). Nature-based solutions for urban sustainability: A review. Nature Sustainability, 5(4), 384–397. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00851-w.
14. Zhang, X., Liu, Y., & Chen, H. (2025). Urban green space collaborative management system based on microservice architecture. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.03830. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.03830.
15. Li, Y., Zhou, Z., & Huang, J. (2025). Effects of subway expansion on urban air quality: Evidence from spatial econometric analysis. Scientific Reports, 15, 98855. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-98855-7.
16. Wang, F., Li, J., & Chen, Y. (2024). Big data-driven urban environmental governance: Spatial spillover effects and policy implications. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12, 1358296. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1358296
17. Silva, R., de Souza, P., & Almeida, M. (2024). Participatory budgeting and integrated urban environmental management in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Urban Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980231123456.
18. Kraus, S., Durst, S., & Ferreira, J. (2023). Evaluating urban sustainability through perceived importance, performance, satisfaction, and loyalty: An integrated IPA–SEM-based modelling approach. Sustainability, 15(12), 9788. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129788
19. Pourabbasi, P. (2025). The role of municipalities in improving environmental components and sustainable development. Strategic Studies in Humanities and Islamic Sciences, 10(74), 147–168. http://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/2285759.
20. Hosseini, S. A., Yaghfoori, H., Hadyani, Z. Identifying the Key Derivers Affecting the Unified Urban Management using Future Study and Senario-Based Planning (Case Study: Qom City, Iran). Geography and Urban Space Development, 2024; 11(3): 107-130. https://doi.org/10.22067/jgusd.2022.77397.1250
21. Modarreszadeh Barzoki, A. Sarvar, R. Asadian, F. Pathology of the Fulfillment of SDI Establishment Requirements and its Strategies in Tehran Metropolitan Peri-Urban. Program and Development Research, 2023; 4(2): 7-34. https://doi.org/10.22034/pbr.2023.377709.1296
22. Salami, S., Mazhari, M. Duties of Urban Management in Realization of the Environmental Rights of Citizens (With a Glance at the Regulations Passed by Tehran City Council). Journal of Research and Development in Comparative Law, 2021; 4(11): 84-111. https://doi.org/10.22034/law.2021.533814.1092.
23. Mohammadian Beiragh, M., Shahmari Ardejani, R., Hassani Mehr, S. S. and Pourshikhian, A. (2025). The Impact of Integrated Urban Management on Enhancing the Livability of Tabriz: Identifying Solutions and Evaluating Its Effects. Urban Economics and Planning, 6(2), 114-134. https://doi.org/10.22034/uep.2025.510887.1609
24. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295–336.
https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1998-07269-010.
25. Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 177–195. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650284
26.  Zeynali Azim, A., Solookaneh Miandoab, H., Latifi Oskouei, M. The analysis of the impact of spiritual intelligence on urban quality of life in Tabriz: A future-oriented approach. Geography and Regional Future Studies, 2025; 3(1): 16-38. https://doi.org/10.30466/grfs.2025.55856.1079.

  • Receive Date 09 August 2025
  • Revise Date 19 October 2025
  • Accept Date 15 November 2025
  • First Publish Date 25 November 2025
  • Publish Date 22 December 2025