Evaluating environmental performance of construction and demolition waste management in Tehran city using the life cycle assessment (LCA)

Authors

1 Master, Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 PhD student at Department of Architectural Science, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Abstract
Rapid urbanization has increased construction and demolition waste (CDW), exacerbating issues around CDW collection, transportation, and disposal in cities lacking efficient management programs. This study applies life cycle assessment (LCA) to evaluate the environmental performance of current CDW management in Tehran and identify critical aspects for improvement. Using Impact 2002+, LCA was conducted for the base case (19.4% recycling), and two alternative scenarios combining landfilling, source separation, sorting, and varying percentages of CDW recycling. The life cycle inventory used primary data from field studies and secondary data from ecoinvent 3.7 and literature. Results demonstrate recycling benefits through avoided impacts from non-renewable energy, global warming, non-carcinogens, and respiratory inorganics and organics versus landfilling. Hence, findings can motivate improved CDW management based on environmental and technical factors, not just economic and political ones. Producers may be compelled to reduce waste sources, while recyclers and stakeholders are encouraged to continuously enhance C&D waste systems across Iran. Additionally, this study provides data to support other LCAs on CDW. Overall, applying LCA reveals critical ways to advance CDW management in Tehran toward a more sustainable system.

Keywords


1. Pacheco-Torgal, F., 1 - Introduction to advances in construction and demolition waste, in Advances in Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling, F. Pacheco-Torgal, et al., Editors. 2020, Woodhead Publishing. p. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857097729.1
2. Yazdanbakhsh, A., A bi-level environmental impact assessment framework for comparing construction and demolition waste management strategies. Waste Management, 2018. 77: p. 401-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.04.024
3. Aslam, M.S., B. Huang, and L. Cui, Review of construction and demolition waste management in China and USA. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020. 264: p. 110445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110445
4. Iodice, S., et al., Sustainability assessment of Construction and Demolition Waste management applied to an Italian case. Waste Management, 2021. 128: p. 83-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.04.031
5. Chau, C.K., et al., Evaluation of the impacts of end-of-life management strategies for deconstruction of a high-rise concrete framed office building. Applied Energy, 2017. 185: p. 1595-1603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.01.019
6. Duan, H., et al., Construction debris becomes growing concern of growing cities. Waste Management, 2019. 83: p. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.10.044
7. Li, J., et al., Environmental impact assessment of mobile recycling of demolition waste in Shenzhen, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020. 263: p. 121371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121371
8. Rosado, L.P., et al., Life cycle assessment of construction and demolition waste management in a large area of São Paulo State, Brazil. Waste Management, 2019. 85: p. 477-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.01.011
9. Haider, H., et al. Life Cycle Assessment of Construction and Demolition Waste Management in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022. 19,  DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19127382.
10.  Quéheille, E., et al., A Life Cycle Assessment model of End-of-life scenarios for building deconstruction and waste management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022. 339: p. 130694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130694
11.  Butera, S., T.H. Christensen, and T.F. Astrup, Life cycle assessment of construction and demolition waste management. Waste Management, 2015. 44: p. 196-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.07.011
12.  Ferronato, N., et al., Environmental assessment of construction and demolition waste recycling in Bolivia: Focus on transportation distances and selective collection rates. Waste Management & Research, 2021. 40(6): p. 793-805.                                                                                     https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X211029170
13.  Epa, U.J.U.S.E.P.A., Office of Land and D. Emergency: Washington, USA, Advancing sustainable materials management: 2014 fact sheet. 2015.
14.  Vitale, P., et al., Life cycle assessment of the end-of-life phase of a residential building. Waste Management, 2017. 60: p. 311-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.10.002
15.  Colangelo, F., et al., Life cycle assessment of recycled concretes: A case study in southern Italy. Science of The Total Environment, 2018. 615: p. 1506-1517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.107
16.  Penteado, C.S.G. and L.P. Rosado, Comparison of scenarios for the integrated management of construction and demolition waste by life cycle assessment: A case study in Brazil. Waste Management & Research, 2016. 34(10): p. 1026-1035. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X16657605
17.  Mercante, I.T., et al., Life cycle assessment of construction and demolition waste management systems: a Spanish case study. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2012. 17(2): p. 232-241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0350-2
18.  Wang, T., et al., Estimating the environmental costs and benefits of demolition waste using life cycle assessment and willingness-to-pay: A case study in Shenzhen. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018. 172: p. 14-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.168
19.  Lockrey, S., et al., Concrete recycling life cycle flows and performance from construction and demolition waste in Hanoi. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018. 179: p. 593-604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.271
20.  Borghi, G., S. Pantini, and L. Rigamonti, Life cycle assessment of non-hazardous Construction and Demolition Waste (CDW) management in Lombardy Region (Italy). Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018. 184: p. 815-825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.287
21.  Csiszar, S.A. and D.E. Meyer, LCA in Relation to Risk Assessment, in Encyclopedia of Sustainable Technologies, M.A. Abraham, Editor. 2017, Elsevier: Oxford. p. 243-251.
22.  pasmandiran.ir, News channel, 2021, [Persian].
23.  Asgari, A., et al., Quality and quantity of construction and demolition waste in Tehran. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, 2017. 15(1): p. 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40201-017-0276-0
24.  Qiao, L., et al., Life cycle assessment of three typical recycled products from construction and demolition waste. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022. 376: p. 134139 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134139
25.  Dahlbo, H., et al., Construction and demolition waste management–a holistic evaluation of environmental performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015. 107: p. 333-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.073
26.  Organization, I.S., ISO 14040: Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Principles and Framework. 1997.
27.  Council, C.I.J.C., Kowloon, Report on strategy for management and reduction of construction and demolition waste in Hong Kong. 2017: p. 9-30.
28.  Akhtar, A. and A.K. Sarmah, Construction and demolition waste generation and properties of recycled aggregate concrete: A global perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018. 186: p. 262-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.085

  • Receive Date 13 July 2023
  • Revise Date 02 September 2023
  • Accept Date 11 September 2023
  • First Publish Date 11 September 2023
  • Publish Date 22 June 2023